Small cameras with big sensors are clearly an important part of the future. From the shockingly affordable cinema cameras from Blackmagic Designs to my beloved Olympus E-M5, it’s clear to see that camera manufacturers are responding to a demand for compact camera systems. Sony is up there toward the front of the “big sensor/small camera” charge and seem to be pushing the technology forward, with last years Cybershot RX100, and now this years Cybershot RX1, which packs a full-frame 35mm sensor into a camera body that could almost fit in your pocket.
All that goodness comes at a price though. When the camera was first announced, my studio geeked out a little since we often get advanced or first run versions. Such was the case with the RX-1. Being camera nerdy we dug into the thing as soon as it arrived via pals at BorrowLenses
My first comment? “Interesting form factor.”
Erik’s first comment? “I just can’t see myself dropping nearly $3,000 for a fixed-lens camera, no matter what kinda guts it has.”
Norton’s first comment? “Gotta give this a chance since its got 24 MegaPixels, ISO 100-25600, dedicated focus, iris and macro rings, and 5 fps burst mode”
Fair ’nuff. We were heading into an intense month of work and travel ahead, so Erik carted this thing around for a few weeks (Thanks E)… Initially it arrived just in time for our Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast with Julien Smith and the badass band My Goodness. During our setup/soundcheck day, between directing duties, we snagged a few of our first shots with the RX1.
Erik’s Notes. The RX1 feels great in use. It’s much smaller than I expected it to be, but the sizable lens, with it’s manual focus and aperture controls built-in, give it just the right amount of grip. The layout of the rest of the controls are great too. Just about every function I care about has a dedicated button, and I love the exposure compensation dial on the top. My only problem with the build of the camera is the lack of a viewfinder, which can be purchased separately for a billion dollars. Quick personal note to camera manufacturers… Stop skimping on built-in viewfinders. I’d MUCH rather have even a POS viewfinder than the nicest pop-up flash you can make. The Olympus EM-5 got it right by building the viewfinder into the body and including an add-on flash with the kit. I use that viewfinder every time I shoot with the camera and I have never once used the flash. Sorry, back to the RX1…
My thoughts: The fixed 35mm Zeiss Sonnar f/2 lens is pretty dope, though for the price of the camera it would have been nice to seen that lens be able to come off the body. It’s a tasty beast, but the inability to swap lenses is going to be a big turn off for people. Concession: luckily Sony picked a sweet-spot of a focal length to stick us with. So while the camera has no zoom, I’ve got legs – the best zoom in the business. So shooting both wide shots and closeups isn’t that big of a problem.
After the Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast, we tidied up the studio and packed our camera bags for a commercial shoot in Belize. Since Erik would be shooting video primarily with a main kit consisted of a couple of Canon 5D mkiii’s with a handful of lenses (ie a handful) any other cameras would pretty much only be used for casual snapshots while we weren’t working. It would be a perfect setting to test the RX1. Erik’s confession: “I still brought my Olympus E-M5 kit.” Seemed he just couldn’t fully commit to being stuck with one lens in such a beautiful place. That plain ol’ 35mm lens just couldn’t keep him covered, and here’s a good example:
Flying over the Great Blue Hole, E had to time my shots just right to get the composition I wanted. I was focused on hanging out of the helicopter and directing the pilot, so it was catch and catch can for Erik’s personal photos. His gripe: “This shot would have been exactly what I wanted if I could have zoomed out just a little bit.”
Back to Erik for some more details: When the days calmed down and the mood was more casual, the RX1 became a delight to shoot with. The camera is really small and unobtrusive, yet still totally sweet looking. It’s a great conversation starter, and you feel like a Rockefeller when the inevitable “so how much does that cost?” question rolls around.
Let’s talk about the leaf shutter, which is built into the lens, thus saving space inside the camera body and aiding the RX1 in retaining its slender girlish figure. It’s also slightly quieter than a butterfly hiccup, and I hate it. I’m genuinely curious to know if anyone agrees with me that a quiet shutter is super unsatisfying. I know this is entirely superficial, but I like my camera to make a little noise when I take the shot. I wanna feel something mechanical move. It should be a point of praise for the smooth functionality of the camera, and it must be great for those weirdos who want to discreetly take pictures of strangers, but I can’t get behind it. I want motor-driving to sound like a motor driving.
My overall reaction (chase): The image quality is all fine and good. The above image was shot by Erik at ISO 2500 and still looks pretty clean. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a relatively spendy camera that doesn’t produce a nice image at high ISO’s, so image quality in new cameras isn’t nearly as much of a concern to me – especially since it’s not my “pro” camera. I’m much more interested these days in the experience of using a camera. Is the camera fun to shoot with? The RX1 is pretty cool, but the lack of a built-in viewfinder (ala Erik’s point earlier) made me miss it. Also like E I found myself reaching for my Olympus E-M5 instead of the RX1 on several occasions. I will say that I am interested to see what the future holds for this camera line and I hope Sony continues to push the compact camera envelope. We all win when that happens, regardless of camera choice.
Erik’s roundup. So is it worth the nearly $3,000 price tag? For my money, no, but here’s my recommendation; everyone who’s reading this should go buy it. Create a huge market for compact full-frame cameras and give Sony the motivation to develop an upgraded version of the RX1 with interchangeable lenses. Now THAT’S something I’d buy.
It seems like the real advantage Sony has is autofocus Zeiss lenses. It seems like they are also limiting their market by not allowing you to buy MORE lenses. I couldn’t live without the viewfinder. Looking at the back of the camera gives a false sense of perspective.
I’m curios if you got to test the high speed sync due to the leaf shutter? One of the most attractive features to me is using on location lighting and dampening the sun’s effects during the peak hours.
I was having this conversation with a friend the other day who just got his x100s. I know the internet photo rock stars (chase, zack, etc.) love these cameras, but I can’t justify or see spending more than $600-700 on a fixed lens camera like the x100s or $800-900 on the RX1. Not when I can pick up an EOS 6D and a 35mm f/2 IS USM for $110 less based on today’s prices at B&H or Adorama. Then for the price to add on the Zeiss external optical view-finder for the RX1 ($598) I could add a 50mm 1.4 and a decent flash with a bounce head to the 6D.
Are some of the features on the RX1 the future? I sure hope they are. I would love to find an alternative to Leica since they have become a boutique product instead of a high-end tool. Are they there yet? Not even close… I think I’ll spend that $2600 to fund a project I’ve been wanting to shoot and make it kick ass with the gear I already have, hipster look or not…
You don’t get it do you?
Mike, apparently I don’t and I’m totally content with that.
The point is you get a big sensor on a small camera that you can take with you everywhere (unlike the 6D with its accessories).
Carrying a camera the size of the 6D and 35mm f/2 IS has never bothered me. If you don’t think you’ll need an external flash or other accessories you can leave them at home. Therefore its not obtrusive to me going about my daily life. I carried an F5, D1H, D1X, D2H, 1D II, III, etc… 8-10hrs a day, every day of my career as a PJ so I’m used to it. Sure, something the size of a Leica M series camera would be more convenient and slightly less obtrusive, but convenience isn’t worth the price point these cameras are at (my opinion). The only time I leave my 5D series camera at home is when I’m out and about with friends for a night of bar hopping and at that point I bring along my G12 not only for its size, but lower price point incase something happens to it. Would it be great to have an RX1 in the $800-900 range? Yes, but I cant justify investing $2800 ($3400 w/ an external viewfinder) on a tool that limits me to one focal length. Its the same reason I wouldn’t buy a hammer that limits me to hitting on kind of nail.
Great post — Love the sample shots. And Norton does look like James Franco.
How about reviewing its video performance?