Small cameras with big sensors are clearly an important part of the future. From the shockingly affordable cinema cameras from Blackmagic Designs to my beloved Olympus E-M5, it’s clear to see that camera manufacturers are responding to a demand for compact camera systems. Sony is up there toward the front of the “big sensor/small camera” charge and seem to be pushing the technology forward, with last years Cybershot RX100, and now this years Cybershot RX1, which packs a full-frame 35mm sensor into a camera body that could almost fit in your pocket.
All that goodness comes at a price though. When the camera was first announced, my studio geeked out a little since we often get advanced or first run versions. Such was the case with the RX-1. Being camera nerdy we dug into the thing as soon as it arrived via pals at BorrowLenses
My first comment? “Interesting form factor.”
Erik’s first comment? “I just can’t see myself dropping nearly $3,000 for a fixed-lens camera, no matter what kinda guts it has.”
Norton’s first comment? “Gotta give this a chance since its got 24 MegaPixels, ISO 100-25600, dedicated focus, iris and macro rings, and 5 fps burst mode”
Fair ’nuff. We were heading into an intense month of work and travel ahead, so Erik carted this thing around for a few weeks (Thanks E)… Initially it arrived just in time for our Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast with Julien Smith and the badass band My Goodness. During our setup/soundcheck day, between directing duties, we snagged a few of our first shots with the RX1.
Erik’s Notes. The RX1 feels great in use. It’s much smaller than I expected it to be, but the sizable lens, with it’s manual focus and aperture controls built-in, give it just the right amount of grip. The layout of the rest of the controls are great too. Just about every function I care about has a dedicated button, and I love the exposure compensation dial on the top. My only problem with the build of the camera is the lack of a viewfinder, which can be purchased separately for a billion dollars. Quick personal note to camera manufacturers… Stop skimping on built-in viewfinders. I’d MUCH rather have even a POS viewfinder than the nicest pop-up flash you can make. The Olympus EM-5 got it right by building the viewfinder into the body and including an add-on flash with the kit. I use that viewfinder every time I shoot with the camera and I have never once used the flash. Sorry, back to the RX1…
My thoughts: The fixed 35mm Zeiss Sonnar f/2 lens is pretty dope, though for the price of the camera it would have been nice to seen that lens be able to come off the body. It’s a tasty beast, but the inability to swap lenses is going to be a big turn off for people. Concession: luckily Sony picked a sweet-spot of a focal length to stick us with. So while the camera has no zoom, I’ve got legs – the best zoom in the business. So shooting both wide shots and closeups isn’t that big of a problem.
After the Chase Jarvis LIVE broadcast, we tidied up the studio and packed our camera bags for a commercial shoot in Belize. Since Erik would be shooting video primarily with a main kit consisted of a couple of Canon 5D mkiii’s with a handful of lenses (ie a handful) any other cameras would pretty much only be used for casual snapshots while we weren’t working. It would be a perfect setting to test the RX1. Erik’s confession: “I still brought my Olympus E-M5 kit.” Seemed he just couldn’t fully commit to being stuck with one lens in such a beautiful place. That plain ol’ 35mm lens just couldn’t keep him covered, and here’s a good example:
Flying over the Great Blue Hole, E had to time my shots just right to get the composition I wanted. I was focused on hanging out of the helicopter and directing the pilot, so it was catch and catch can for Erik’s personal photos. His gripe: “This shot would have been exactly what I wanted if I could have zoomed out just a little bit.”
Back to Erik for some more details: When the days calmed down and the mood was more casual, the RX1 became a delight to shoot with. The camera is really small and unobtrusive, yet still totally sweet looking. It’s a great conversation starter, and you feel like a Rockefeller when the inevitable “so how much does that cost?” question rolls around.
Let’s talk about the leaf shutter, which is built into the lens, thus saving space inside the camera body and aiding the RX1 in retaining its slender girlish figure. It’s also slightly quieter than a butterfly hiccup, and I hate it. I’m genuinely curious to know if anyone agrees with me that a quiet shutter is super unsatisfying. I know this is entirely superficial, but I like my camera to make a little noise when I take the shot. I wanna feel something mechanical move. It should be a point of praise for the smooth functionality of the camera, and it must be great for those weirdos who want to discreetly take pictures of strangers, but I can’t get behind it. I want motor-driving to sound like a motor driving.
My overall reaction (chase): The image quality is all fine and good. The above image was shot by Erik at ISO 2500 and still looks pretty clean. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a relatively spendy camera that doesn’t produce a nice image at high ISO’s, so image quality in new cameras isn’t nearly as much of a concern to me – especially since it’s not my “pro” camera. I’m much more interested these days in the experience of using a camera. Is the camera fun to shoot with? The RX1 is pretty cool, but the lack of a built-in viewfinder (ala Erik’s point earlier) made me miss it. Also like E I found myself reaching for my Olympus E-M5 instead of the RX1 on several occasions. I will say that I am interested to see what the future holds for this camera line and I hope Sony continues to push the compact camera envelope. We all win when that happens, regardless of camera choice.
Erik’s roundup. So is it worth the nearly $3,000 price tag? For my money, no, but here’s my recommendation; everyone who’s reading this should go buy it. Create a huge market for compact full-frame cameras and give Sony the motivation to develop an upgraded version of the RX1 with interchangeable lenses. Now THAT’S something I’d buy.
Totally like the camera reviews/impressions. Thanks.
You can rent it here: http://www.borrowlenses.com/product/Sony_Cybershot_DSCRX1_Full_Frame_Compact_Digital_Camera
I love the Fuji x100s. You get used to the fixed lens, shooting with one hand, awesome dynamic range, ultrashort shutter lag, rangefinder look. Compared with the price of the RX1, the x100s seems pretty good.
Zeiss also has the Touit line for Sony/Fuji. Wondering how that Touit glass compares to the Sonnar glass on this smaller cameras.
I’ve been researching small mirror less cameras as a carry-around so I don’t have to lug around the D800 all the time. I looked at this camera. The price is a bit unsettling, but I’d still buy it if it were “right”. I don’t think that i would mind the fixed lens – i get SO sick of dust on sensors! The lack of a a viewfinder ends up being the deal breaker for me (and an extra LOT of money for the EVF becomes insulting). I wanna compose photographs with the camera-to-eye. So, still not sure… I too like to be ale to hear a shutter.
This is the type of content thats been missing. Loved it.